← Back to search

National Institutes of Health · Department of Health and Human Services

NextTech: Translational Development of Next-Generation Diagnostic and Therapeutic Devices (R18 Clinical Trial Not Allowed)

Forecast — not open yet ? · Opportunity RFA-EB-26-004 · Assistance Listing 93.286, 93.121

Key facts

Deadline
Forecast — the expected date (Sep 18, 2026) has passed; watch for the official notice
Award size
Not specified — see notice
Total available
$6M · about 4 awards
Cost share / match ?
Not required
Who can apply
Small business, Larger business, Tribal government, Public college or university, City or town government, Nonprofit with 501(c)(3), State government, Tribal organization, Nonprofit without 501(c)(3), Special district (utility, fire, etc.), Private college or university, School district, Other (see eligibility), County government
Where
Anywhere in the U.S., including Tennessee

Before you apply: federal grants require an active SAM.gov registration (Unique Entity ID) and a Grants.gov account. Registration is free but can take weeks, so start now, not when the deadline is close. Grant-ready checklist

How this fits you

  • Available in Tennessee (nationwide program)
  • No cost share required
  • Tennessee recipients since 2023: 42

Tell us who you are to see whether you're eligible.

More from National Institutes of Health

Read the official notice View on Grants.gov Sign in to save

About this grant

This Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) is to encourage applications from investigators to advance the development and translation of next-generation technologies to prevent, monitor, diagnose, and treat disorders within the missions of the NIH Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies (BRAIN) and The Helping to End Addiction Long-term (HEAL) Initiatives. Awarded activities will facilitate the translation of new devices up to the stage of readiness for first in human (FIH) clinical trials by overcoming key challenges identified during preliminary proof-of-concept studies. The scope of the program includes technology development and optimization, and studies to prepare for approvals for human use.

Eligibility (from the notice)

Other Eligible ApplicantsIndian/Native American Tribal Governments (Other than Federally Recognized);Eligible Agencies of the Federal Government;U.S. Territory or Possession;Faith-based or Community-based Organizations;Regional Organizations;Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entities (Foreign Institutions).

Who in Tennessee has won this program

42 awards to Tennessee recipients in 5 counties since federal FY2023. Largest shown:

Past Tennessee recipients
RecipientWhereAmountFY
Ut-Battelle LlcOak Ridge, Anderson County$8M2014
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterNashville, Davidson County$5.4M2003
Vanderbilt UniversityNashville, Davidson County$5.1M2015
Vanderbilt UniversityNashville, Davidson County$4M2014
Vanderbilt UniversityNashville, Davidson County$3.2M2012
Tennessee State UniversityNashville, Davidson County$2.8M2021
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterNashville, Davidson County$2.6M2014
Vanderbilt UniversityNashville, Davidson County$2.6M2022
Vanderbilt UniversityNashville, Davidson County$2.5M2019
University Of TennesseeKnoxville, Knox County$2.4M2022
Vanderbilt UniversityNashville, Davidson County$2.4M2022
Vanderbilt UniversityNashville, Davidson County$2.3M2016

Source: USAspending.gov. Past awards show who this program funds; they don't guarantee future awards.

About the program (93.121)

Oral Diseases and Disorders Research — Dental, Oral and Craniofacial Research.

How applications are judged

The primary criteria for evaluating grant applications include assessment of: (1) the scientific merit, significance and overall impact of the proposed study and its objectives; (2) the competency of the proposed investigator(s) to successfully pursue the project; (3) the innovation and novelty of the concepts, approaches, or methodologies; (4) the technical adequacy of the experimental design and approach; (5) the adequacy of the available proposed facilities and resources; (6) the necessity of the budget components requested in relation to the proposed project; and (7) the relevance and importance to the posted institute program objectives. Also evaluated, where applicable, but not scored are: (1) protections for human subjects; (2) inclusion of women, minorities, and children; (3) vertebrate animal welfare; and (4) adequate protection of research personnel and/or the environment, biosafety, biocontainment and the security of select agents; (5) resource sharing plans; (6) authentication of key biological and/or chemical resources, (7) budget and period of support. In addition, the following criteria will be used in considering the scientific and technical merit of SBIR/STTR Phase I grant applications: the potential of the proposed research for commercial application. Phase II grant applications will reviewed based upon the following criteria: (1) The degree to which the Phase I objectives were met and feasibility demonstrated; (2) the scientific and technical merit...

Matching requirements

This program has no statutory formula. Matching requirements are not applicable to this assistance listing. MOE requirements are not applicable to this assistance listing.

Examples of funded projects

Not Applicable.

Program listing on SAM.gov

About the program (93.286)

Discovery and Applied Research for Technological Innovations to Improve Human Health

How applications are judged

The major elements in evaluating proposals include assessments of: (1) Significance: Does this study address an important problem? If the aims of the application are achieved, how will scientific knowledge be advanced? What will be the effect of these studies on the concepts or methods that drive this field? (2) Approach: Are the conceptual framework, design, methods, and analyses adequately developed, well-integrated, and appropriate to the aims of the project? Does the applicant acknowledge potential problem areas and consider alternative tactics? (3) Innovation: Does the project employ novel concepts, approaches or method? Are the aims original and innovative? Does the project challenge existing paradigms or develop new methodologies or technologies? (4) Investigator: Is the investigator appropriately trained and well suited to carry out this work? Is the work proposed appropriate to the experience level of the principal investigator and other researchers (if any)? (5) Environment: Does the scientific environment in which the work will be done contribute to the probability of success? Do the proposed experiments take advantage of unique features of the scientific environment or employ useful collaborative arrangements? Is there evidence of institutional support? (6) the appropriateness of the proposed budget and duration in relation to the proposed research; (7) the relevance and importance to announced program objectives; (8) the adequacy of plans to include both...

Matching requirements

This program has no statutory formula. Matching requirements are not applicable to this assistance listing. MOE requirements are not applicable to this assistance listing.

Examples of funded projects

Not Applicable.

Program listing on SAM.gov

Something wrong with this listing? Tell us
What's wrong?