← Back to search

National Institutes of Health · Department of Health and Human Services

Integrated Specific Pathogen Free Research Models and Human New Approach Methodologies to Advance HIV/AIDS Research (U42 Clinical Trial Not Allowed)

Opening soon

Key facts

Deadline
Opens Nov 24, 2026 · due about Jan 25, 2027 Estimate, not confirmed by the funder ?
Award size
$212K – $2.7M
Match ?
Not required · Work out your budget and match
Who can apply
State government, County government, City or town government, Private college or university, Tribal government, Nonprofit without 501(c)(3), School district, Small business, Nonprofit with 501(c)(3), Public college or university, Tribal organization, Larger business, Special district (utility, fire, etc.), and others named in the official notice
Where
Anywhere in the U.S., including Tennessee

Opening soon: the funder has announced this grant, but you can't apply yet. Use the time to get ready and check whether it fits.

Before you apply: federal grants require an active SAM.gov registration (Unique Entity ID) and a Grants.gov account. Registration is free but can take weeks, so start now, not when the deadline is close. Get-ready checklist

How this fits you

  • Available in Tennessee (nationwide program)
  • No match required
  • Past Tennessee awards on file: 36

Tell us who you are to see whether you're eligible.

View on Grants.gov Add dates to my calendar

More from National Institutes of Health

About this grant

This NOFO is issued during a period of accelerating development, validation, and adoption of human new approach methodologies (NAMs). Accordingly, it has two integrated priorities for NIH-funded HIV/AIDS research: (1) implementation of a NAMs-enabled stewardship framework, including optional HIV-relevant human in vitro testing support and pilot benchmarking activities, to reduce or replace specific pathogen free (SPF) in vivo model use where scientifically appropriate without compromising rigor, reproducibility, or translational relevance; and (2) support for high-quality SPF colony resources for studies in which well-characterized in vivo models remain scientifically necessary. Under the NAMs-enabled component, required elements include: (1) integration of a NAMs triage and consultation service within request intake and allocation workflows to identify NAM-feasible studies and document reductions or replacements in in vivo use; and (2) establishment of a formal referral pathway to NAM centers as well as human tissue and other human science based resources to facilitate collaborative HIV-relevant human NAM development, benchmarking, and refinement. Applicants may also propose optional NAMs-enabled HIV human in vitro testing support (research use only), including standardized operating procedures, quality control frameworks, and user guidance for viral load quantification, drug resistance assessment, and ex vivo susceptibility assays, as well as optional pilot benchmarking projects to define performance metrics, quality control benchmarks, and context-of-use statements for HIV-relevant human NAMs. Under the SPF resource component, the award will support core colony operations, including colony management and husbandry; transparent, merit-based request intake and allocation; comprehensive virologic surveillance and rapid mitigation to preserve SPF status; and high-resolution immunogenetic characterization (e.g., MHC typing) to enable rigorous, genotype-informed study design and efficient stewardship of limited in vivo resources.

Who can apply, from the official notice

Other Eligible ApplicantsIndian/Native American Tribal Governments (Other than Federally Recognized);Eligible Agencies of the Federal Government;U.S. Territory or Possession;Faith-based or Community-based Organizations;Regional Organizations;Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entities (Foreign Institutions).

Ask a partner for a letter

Who in Tennessee has won this program

30 awards to Tennessee groups in 3 counties since 2019. Largest shown:

Past Tennessee winners
Past winnerWhereAmountFiscal year
Vanderbilt UniversityNashville$2.6M spent that year2025
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterNashville, Davidson County$2M2019
Vanderbilt UniversityNashville, Davidson County$2M2021
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterNashville, Davidson County$2M2021
Vanderbilt UniversityNashville, Davidson County$2M2024
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterNashville, Davidson County$2M2025
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterNashville, Davidson County$1.9M2025
Vanderbilt UniversityNashville, Davidson County$1.6M2022
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterNashville, Davidson County$1.3M spent that year2025
Vanderbilt UniversityNashville, Davidson County$1.3M2026
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, IncorporatedOak Ridge$1.1M spent that year2025
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterNashville, Davidson County$857K2023

Source: Federal Audit Clearinghouse, USAspending.gov. Past awards show who this program funds. They don't guarantee future awards.

Tennessee groups that got this money through a state agency or another organization

This federal money also reaches local groups as pass-through grants. 6 pass-through grants on file. Largest shown:

Tennessee pass-through grant winners
Past winnerWhereThroughAmountFiscal year
Vanderbilt UniversityNashvilleVumc$1.4M spent that year2024
Vanderbilt UniversityNashville, Davidson CountyVanderbilt University Medical Center$857K2023
Vanderbilt UniversityNashville, Davidson CountyVanderbilt University Medical Center$597K2023
Vanderbilt UniversityNashville, Davidson CountyOregon Health & Science University$75K2023
Vanderbilt UniversityNashvilleVanderbilt University Medical Center$60K spent that year2025
Vanderbilt UniversityNashvilleOregon Health & Science University— spent that year2024

Source: USAspending.gov pass-through reports (the first recipient reports each one of $30,000 or more).

About the federal program

Research Infrastructure Programs, also called “Comparative Medicine, Instrumentation, Research Infrastructure”
Program number 93.351 (the federal Assistance Listing number) · U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health · Project grant

How applications are judged

The major elements in evaluating proposals include assessments of: (1) The scientific merit and general significance of the proposed study and its objectives; (2) the technical adequacy of the experimental design and approach; (3) the competency of the proposed investigator or group to successfully pursue the project; (4) the adequacy of the available and proposed facilities and resources; (5) the necessity of the budget components requested in relation to the proposed project; and (6) the relevance and importance to announced program objectives. The major elements in evaluating proposals for scientific instruments include assessments of (1) the need for the instruments; (2) technical expertise in the requested technology; (3) advancements of research projects when the novel technology is available; (4) administration of the usage of the instrument and (5) institutional support for the long term maintenance and the usage of the instrument.

Match

None required (federal program listing).

This program on SAM.gov

Something wrong on this page? Tell us
What's wrong?

Source: Federal grants from Grants.gov · the official federal record. Last checked by GrantMe Oct 7, 2026.

Reference numbers: official notice number PAR-28-019 · program number 93.351