← Back to search

National Institutes of Health · Department of Health and Human Services

Carcinogen Hazard Assessment Monographs Program (CHAMP) (R01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed)

Forecast — not open yet ? · Opportunity RFA-CA-26-006 · Assistance Listing 93.393, 93.396, 93.399

Key facts

Deadline
Forecast — the expected date (Jun 30, 2026) has passed; watch for the official notice
Award size
Not specified — see notice
Cost share / match ?
Not required
Who can apply
Other (see eligibility), Private college or university, Larger business, Tribal organization, School district, County government, Tribal government, Nonprofit with 501(c)(3), Small business, Nonprofit without 501(c)(3), Public college or university
Where
Anywhere in the U.S., including Tennessee

Before you apply: federal grants require an active SAM.gov registration (Unique Entity ID) and a Grants.gov account. Registration is free but can take weeks, so start now, not when the deadline is close. Grant-ready checklist

How this fits you

  • Available in Tennessee (nationwide program)
  • No cost share required
  • Tennessee recipients since 2023: 37

Tell us who you are to see whether you're eligible.

More from National Institutes of Health

Read the official notice View on Grants.gov Sign in to save

About this grant

Through this Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO), the National Cancer Institute (NCI) invites applications to critically and systematically evaluate the scientific evidence on carcinogenic hazards to humans. Identifying potential carcinogens is essential for guiding and advancing cancer research, as well as informing cancer control and prevention efforts. The resulting monographs will serve as crucial references that shape health policy and regulation, ultimately helping to reduce the cancer burden for all

Eligibility (from the notice)

Other Eligible ApplicantsIndian/Native American Tribal Governments (Other than Federally Recognized);Eligible Agencies of the Federal Government;U.S. Territory or Possession;Regional Organizations;Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entities (Foreign Institutions).

Who in Tennessee has won this program

37 awards to Tennessee recipients in 3 counties since federal FY2023. Largest shown:

Past Tennessee recipients
RecipientWhereAmountFY
St Jude Children'S Research Hospital IncMemphis, Shelby County$31.4M2003
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterNashville, Davidson County$25.8M2009
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterNashville, Davidson County$14M2016
Vanderbilt UniversityNashville, Davidson County$14M1997
Baptist Memorial Hospital-TiptonCovington, Tipton County$11.9M2014
St Jude Children'S Research Hospital IncMemphis, Shelby County$11.4M2017
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterNashville, Davidson County$11.1M1981
Vanderbilt UniversityNashville, Davidson County$10.8M2020
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterNashville, Davidson County$9.8M2023
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterNashville, Davidson County$9.4M2017
St Jude Children'S Research Hospital IncMemphis, Shelby County$9.2M2018
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterNashville, Davidson County$8.6M2021

Source: USAspending.gov. Past awards show who this program funds; they don't guarantee future awards.

About the program (93.393)

Cancer Cause and Prevention Research

How applications are judged

The major elements in evaluating proposals include assessments of: (1) The scientific merit and general significance of the proposed study and its objectives; 2) the technical adequacy of the experimental design and approach; (3) the competency of the proposed investigator or group to successfully pursue the project; (4) the adequacy of the available and proposed facilities and resources; (5) the necessity of the budget components requested in relation to the proposed project; and (6) the relevance and importance to announced program objectives. The following criteria will be used in considering the scientific and technical merit of SBIR/STTR Phase I grant applications: (1) The soundness and technical merit of the proposed approach; (2) the qualifications of the proposed principal investigator, supporting staff, and consultants; (3) the technological innovation of the proposed research; (4) the potential of the proposed research for commercial application; (5) the appropriateness of the budget requested; (6) the adequacy and suitability of the facilities and research environment; and (7) where applicable, the adequacy of assurances detailing the proposed means for (a) safeguarding human or animal subjects, and/or (b) protecting against or minimizing any adverse effect on the environment. Phase II grant applications will be reviewed based upon the following criteria: (1) The degree to which the Phase I objectives were met and feasibility demonstrated; (2) the scientific...

Matching requirements

This program has no statutory formula. Matching requirements are not applicable to this assistance listing. MOE requirements are not applicable to this assistance listing.

Examples of funded projects

Not Applicable.

Program listing on SAM.gov

About the program (93.396)

Cancer Biology Research

How applications are judged

The major elements in evaluating applications include assessments of: (1) The scientific merit and general significance of the proposed study and its objectives; (2) the technical adequacy of the experimental design and approach; (3) the competency of the proposed investigator or group to successfully pursue the project; (4) the adequacy of the available and proposed facilities and resources; (5) the necessity of the budget components requested in relation to the proposed project; and (6) the relevance and importance to announced program objectives. The following will be considered in making funding decisions: 1) Scientific and technical merit of the proposed project as determined by scientific peer review; 2) Availability of funds; and 3) Relevance of the proposed project to program priorities.

Matching requirements

This program has no statutory formula. Matching requirements are not applicable to this assistance listing. MOE requirements are not applicable to this assistance listing.

Examples of funded projects

Not Applicable.

Program listing on SAM.gov

About the program (93.399)

Cancer Control — Cancer Control Grants

How applications are judged

The major elements in evaluating proposals include assessments of: (1) The scientific merit and general significance of the proposed study and its objectives; (2) the technical adequacy of the experimental design and approach; (3) the competency of the proposed investigator or group to successfully pursue the project; (4) the adequacy of the available and proposed facilities and resources; (5) the necessity of the budget components requested in relation to the proposed project; and (6) the relevance and importance to announced program objectives.

Matching requirements

This program has no statutory formula. Matching requirements are not applicable to this assistance listing. MOE requirements are not applicable to this assistance listing.

Examples of funded projects

Not Applicable.

Program listing on SAM.gov

Something wrong with this listing? Tell us
What's wrong?