← Back to search

Geological Survey · Department of the Interior

Cooperative Agreement for affiliated Partner with Northern Great Plains Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit

Open

In short: Geological Survey expects to make 1 award of up to $450,000.

Key facts

Deadline
Due Nov 14, 2026 · 31 days left
The funder says: “Electronically submitted applications must be submitted no later than 11:59 PM, ET, on the listed application due date”
Award size
Up to $450K
Total available
$450K · about 1 award
Match ?
Not required · Work out your budget and match
Who can apply
Set by the official notice: see Who can apply below
Where
Check the official notice for location limits

Before you apply: federal grants require an active SAM.gov registration (Unique Entity ID) and a Grants.gov account. Registration is free but can take weeks, so start now, not when the deadline is close. Get-ready checklist

How this fits you

  • Location limits unclear. Check who can apply
  • No match required
  • Past Tennessee awards on file: 13

Tell us who you are to see whether you're eligible.

About this grant

Robust and reliable quantitative method to correct for solution chemistry interferences in molecularly imprinted polymer – electrochemical sensor (MIP-ES) measurements of complex environmental water matrices The goal of this research is to develop a robust and reliable quantitative method to correct for solution chemistry interferences in MIP-ES measurements of complex environmental water matrices. One of the challenges using MIP-ES to measure contaminants such as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in environmental samples is understanding how bulk solution chemistry contributes to the electrochemical background signal. The development of a ratiometric comparison approach with MIP-ES will involve bench scale proof of concept testing and then escalate to field deployed trials. Instrumentation required for MIP-ES fabrication and sensing includes multichannel potentiostats capable of differential pulse voltammetry and cyclic voltammetry. Differential pulse voltammetry will be used to collect current differences at 1-minute and 15-minute incubation time points in the sample matrices. These current values will be used to build the ratiometric comparison approach. The ratiometric approach will involve the comparison of normalized current difference ratios, outlined in Equation 1, between a matrix matched solution that contains all matrix constituents minus the analyte in question and an unknown solution that is composed of the sample matrix and may or may not contain the analyte. The use of a ratiometric comparison isolates current differences from the association of the analyte with the MIP-ES binding sites from any change in current from interferent effects due to the rest of the sample matrix constituents (i.e., humic acids, fulvic acids, ions, non-fluorinated counterparts, etc.). A ratio close to 1 indicates the absence of the analyte due to similar normalized current difference values in the ratio. A statistically different ratio from 1 indicates the presence of the analyte in question in the sample matrix. This project supports the administration's priority to protecting human health by generating data and tools that identify potential risks to drinking water quality. By enabling early detection and informed decision-making, this work helps safeguard communities from exposure to harmful contaminants and ensures access to safe, clean drinking water.

Who can apply, from the official notice

This financial assistance opportunity is being issued under a Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Units (CESU) Program. CESU's are partnerships that provide research, technical assistance, and education. Eligible recipients must be a participating partner of the Northern Great Plains Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit.

View on Grants.gov Add deadline to my calendar

Ask a partner for a letter

Your schedule, working back from the deadline

  1. Oct14
    Check that your SAM.gov registration is active (or start it now)
    Grants.gov: allow up to 10 business days for SAM registration, weeks or months if information isn't verified. It must be renewed every year. Grants.gov
  2. Oct24
    Ask partners for letters of support or commitment
    Suggested: partners need about three weeks to write and sign letters.
  3. Nov9
    Finish a complete draft for a final review
    Suggested: leave about a week for someone else to read the draft.
  4. Nov12
    Submit
    Grants.gov: submit at least 24–48 hours before the deadline: uploads fail, systems slow down, errors need fixing. Grants.gov blog
  5. Nov14
    Deadline
    From the funder.

Save this grant to put these dates in My grants and your private calendar.

Who in Tennessee has won this program

12 awards to Tennessee groups in 6 counties since 2019. Largest shown:

Past Tennessee winners
Past winnerWhereAmountFiscal year
University of MemphisMemphis, Shelby County$4.3M2020
State of TennesseeNashville$1.1M spent that year2025
Middle Tennessee State UniversityMurfreesboro, Rutherford County$394K2019
University of MemphisMemphis, Shelby County$256K2020
University of TennesseeKnoxville, Knox County$150K2019
Austin Peay State UniversityClarksville, Montgomery County$134K2021
Department of Environment & Conservation TennesseeNashville, Davidson County$87K2024
The University of the SouthSewanee, Franklin County$53K2019
Ducks Unlimited, Inc.Memphis, Shelby County$45K spent that year2025
University of MemphisMemphis, Shelby County$42K2023
University of MemphisMemphis, Shelby County$40K2022
Austin Peay State UniversityClarksville, Montgomery County$30K2019

Source: USAspending.gov; Federal Audit Clearinghouse. Past awards show who this program funds. They don't guarantee future awards.

Tennessee groups that got this money through a state agency or another organization

This federal money also reaches local groups as pass-through grants. 1 pass-through grant on file. Largest shown:

Tennessee pass-through grant winners
Past winnerWhereThroughAmountFiscal year
State of TennesseeNashvilleAmericaview$5,016 spent that year2025

Source: USAspending.gov pass-through reports (the first recipient reports each one of $30,000 or more).

Similar grants open or opening soon

From other funders, about the same kind of work.

More from Geological Survey

About the federal program

U.S. Geological Survey Research and Data Collection
Program number 15.808 (the federal Assistance Listing number) · U.S. Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey · Cooperative agreement (a grant with close agency involvement)

How applications are judged

Scientists within the Geological Survey will review and evaluate all applications consistent with authorized USGS program purposes. Criteria for judging applications will include scientific excellence and relevance to the solution of important problems within the mission of the Geological Survey. Applications will be funded only to the extent permitted by available funds.

Match

None required (federal program listing).

Examples of funded projects

Fiscal year 2025: Some examples of 2025 project are - The support and improvement of the Shakealert System - Regional and Urban Seismic Monitoring - Establishing a Radiocarbon Instrument at University of Alaska Fairbanks - Hawaii and Alaska Volcano Hazard Assessment and Monitoring - Development of tools for forecasting and Monitoring Agroclimatic conditions -

This program on SAM.gov

Something wrong on this page? Tell us
What's wrong?

Source: Federal grants from Grants.gov · the official federal record. Last checked by GrantMe Oct 14, 2026.

Reference numbers: official notice number G27AS00052 · program number 15.808