← Back to search

NASA Headquarters · National Aeronautics and Space Administration

ROSES 2025: B.7 The Heliophysics Low-Cost Access to Space

Open

Key facts

Deadline
Due Mar 16, 2027 · 160 days left
Award size
Not stated: see the official notice
Match ?
Not required · Work out your budget and match
Who can apply
Set by the official notice: see Who can apply below
Where
Anywhere in the U.S., including Tennessee

Before you apply: federal grants require an active SAM.gov registration (Unique Entity ID) and a Grants.gov account. Registration is free but can take weeks, so start now, not when the deadline is close. Get-ready checklist

How this fits you

  • Available in Tennessee (nationwide program)
  • No match required
  • Past Tennessee awards on file: 65

Tell us who you are to see whether you're eligible.

View on Grants.gov Add deadline to my calendar

More from NASA Headquarters

About this grant

The close date above is the date for the Step-2 proposal due date. The Step-1 proposal due date is November 20, 2026. Step-2 proposals cannot be submitted if a Step-1 proposal was not submitted. NOTICE: Amended October 7, 2026. This amendment adds this new program element to ROSES-2025. Step-1 proposals are due by November 20, 2026, and Step-2 proposals are due March 16, 2027. The page limit for the anonymized central Science-Technical-Management (S/T/M) section of proposals is 20 pages. Proposers must provide a separately uploaded Payload Reference Document (PRD) to allow NASA to best match the research payload needs with multiple compatible flight platforms and identify the greatest suborbital research capabilities and launch flexibilities possible. See Section 1.3.1. New: Proposals must include a “Rideshare Opportunity” section that describes the availability of resources for a rideshare instrument to be included with the flight. See Section 4.4. New: Proposals self-identified as "science-enabling-only" must include an Application of Traceability Matrix, see 4.2.3. New: Proposals will be submitted via a binding two-step submission process, see Section 3. New: Proposals will be evaluated using dual anonymous peer review, so the technical proposal must be anonymized, see Section 5.1. All proposers are strongly encouraged to use the standard SMD template for the Open Science Data Management Plan see https://science.nasa.gov/researchers/sara/faqs/OSDMP This synopsis is a generic summary that is posted for each of the many individual "program elements" in NASA’s Research Opportunities in Space and Earth Sciences (ROSES) – 2025 solicitation. For specific information on this particular program element download and read the PDF of the text of this program element by going to Tables 2 or 3 of ROSES at https://solicitation.nasaprs.com/ROSES2025table2 and https://solicitation.nasaprs.com/ROSES2025table3, respectively, click the title of the program element of interest, a hypertext link will take you to a page for that particular program element. On that page, on the right side under "Announcement Documents" the link on the bottom will be to the PDF of the text of the call for proposals. For example, if one were interested in the Solar System Science program (NNH25ZDA001N-SCUBED) one would follow the link to the NSPIRES page for that program element and...

Who can apply, from the official notice

Proposers must be affiliated with an institution at nspires.nasaprs.com/ and, in general, NASA provides funding only to U.S. institutions. Organizations outside the U.S. that propose on the basis of a policy of no-exchange-of-funds; consult the NASA Grant and Cooperative Agreement Manual (GCAM) (https://www.nasa.gov/grants-policy-and-compliance-team/#Regulations) for specific details. Some NRAs may be issued jointly with a non-U.S. organization, e.g., those concerning guest observing programs for jointly sponsored space science programs, that will contain additional special guidelines for non-U.S. participants. Also reference the GCAM for special instructions for proposals from non-U.S. organizations that involve U.S. personnel for whom NASA support is requested.

Ask a partner for a letter

Your schedule, working back from the deadline

  1. Oct7
    Check that your SAM.gov registration is active (or start it now)
    Grants.gov: allow up to 10 business days for SAM registration, weeks or months if information isn't verified. It must be renewed every year. Grants.gov
  2. Feb23
    Ask partners for letters of support or commitment
    Suggested: partners need about three weeks to write and sign letters.
  3. Mar9
    Finish a complete draft for a final review
    Suggested: leave about a week for someone else to read the draft.
  4. Mar14
    Submit
    Grants.gov: submit at least 24–48 hours before the deadline: uploads fail, systems slow down, errors need fixing. Grants.gov blog
  5. Mar16
    Deadline
    From the funder.

Save this grant to put these dates in My grants and your private calendar.

Who in Tennessee has won this program

29 awards to Tennessee groups in 4 counties since 2017. Largest shown:

Past Tennessee winners
Past winnerWhereAmountFiscal year
University of TennesseeKnoxville, Knox County$9.6M2017
Vanderbilt UniversityNashville, Davidson County$2.9M2021
State of TennesseeNashville$1.7M spent that year2025
Vanderbilt UniversityNashville$1.2M spent that year2025
Vanderbilt UniversityNashville, Davidson County$826K2020
Vanderbilt UniversityNashville, Davidson County$726K2023
University of TennesseeKnoxville, Knox County$695K2018
Vanderbilt UniversityNashville, Davidson County$639K2018
Vanderbilt UniversityNashville, Davidson County$634K2017
University of TennesseeKnoxville, Knox County$595K2022
University of TennesseeKnoxville, Knox County$567K2025
Vanderbilt UniversityNashville, Davidson County$557K2022

Source: USAspending.gov, Federal Audit Clearinghouse. Past awards show who this program funds. They don't guarantee future awards.

Tennessee groups that got this money through Tennessee Higher Education Commission

This federal money also reaches local groups as pass-through grants. In Tennessee, Tennessee Higher Education Commission passes it on: watch that agency for applications, not the federal agency. 36 pass-through grants on file. Largest shown:

Tennessee pass-through grant winners
Past winnerWhereThroughAmountFiscal year
Vanderbilt UniversityNashville, Davidson CountyOhio State University the$604K2024
University of TennesseeKnoxville, Knox CountyPlanetary Science Institute$275K2025
Tennessee Technological UniversityCookeville, Putnam CountyUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill$258K2023
Vanderbilt UniversityNashville, Davidson CountyOhio State University the$174K2026
Vanderbilt UniversityNashvilleOhio State University$173K spent that year2025
University of TennesseeKnoxville, Knox CountyPlanetary Science Institute$169K2024
Vanderbilt UniversityNashville, Davidson CountyYale University$130K2024
University of TennesseeKnoxville, Knox CountyPlanetary Science Institute$125K2024
State of TennesseeNashvilleUniversity of Toledo$118K spent that year2024
University of TennesseeKnoxville, Knox CountyThe Johns Hopkins University$105K2024
University of TennesseeKnoxville, Knox CountyUniversity of Arizona$86K2023
State of TennesseeNashvilleThe University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill$81K spent that year2025

Source: USAspending.gov pass-through reports (the first recipient reports each one of $30,000 or more).

About the federal program

Science, also called “SMD”
Program number 43.001 (the federal Assistance Listing number) · National Aeronautics and Space Administration · Cooperative agreement (a grant with close agency involvement), project grant, direct payment for a set purpose, use of federal property, facilities or equipment, training

How applications are judged

Unless otherwise specified in the NOFO, the evaluation criteria considered in evaluating a proposal are intrinsic merit, relevance, and cost. Intrinsic Merit includes the consideration of the following factors, as applicable to the particular proposal 1) The scientific quality of the proposed project, including, but not limited to, the scientific rationale and the expected significance and/or impact of the proposed work. 2) Overall, technical quality of the proposed work, includes, but is not limited to, the quality of the management plan and project timeline for carrying out the work and the effectiveness and resilience of the proposed experimental designs, methods, techniques, and approaches for achieving the proposed goals and/or objectives. 3) The qualifications, capabilities, and expertise of personnel demonstrated by the proposal (e.g., publications, delivered products, and other measures of productivity and/or experience) that would affect the likelihood of achieving the objectives. 4) Facilities, instruments, equipment and other resources or support systems presented in the proposal that would affect the likelihood of achieving the proposed objectives. A proposal's relevance includes the consideration of the potential contribution to NASA's mission as expressed in its most recent NASA strategic plans and the permitted scope and specific objectives and goals given in the funding announcement. Cost of a proposed effort includes the reasonableness of the proposed...

Match

Most awards have no matching requirement. Specifics about cost sharing and matching resources are described in the NOFO.

Examples of funded projects

Fiscal year 2025: The focus of the BioS-ENDURES Consortium is innovation, acceleration, and implementation of space biology specific knowledge and technology centered on human-plant-microbiome relationships to enable a durable human presence in low Earth orbit and beyond. Studying fundamental relationships between humans, plants, and their microbiomes under space flight conditions will reveal new biological mechanisms that will address needs for sustainability and risk mitigation in space exploration. A more thorough understanding is needed of mechanisms underlying responses to space-relevant stressors (ionizing radiation, microgravity, circadian disruption, abiotics, and biotics) to both humans and plant food sources and what role microbiomes may play in shaping those responses. Relationships between microorganisms and humans in isolated and constrained environments such as space habitats must be better understood to enable successful long-term habitation in space. Human/animal, plant, and microbial biologists will work together to ensure an integrated view of the space flight biosphere by enhancing data acquisition, modeling, and testing. Fiscal year 2026: SMD publishes...

This program on SAM.gov

Something wrong on this page? Tell us
What's wrong?

Source: Federal grants from Grants.gov · the official federal record. Last checked by GrantMe Oct 7, 2026.

Reference numbers: official notice number NNH25ZDA001N-LCAS · program number 43.001