← Back to the grant

Narrative outline

Program to End Modern Slavery Annual Program Statement. One section per scoring criterion, in the notice's order, so reviewers find each answer where they expect it. Fill in every [[NEEDS: …]] with your own facts.

Download as text Score your draft

Narrative limit: 10 pages. Suggested pages follow each section's share of the points. Scores listed: 100 points. The notice's total wasn't found, so check it. Source: the official notice, FY_2026_PEMS_Annual_Program_Statement_1.pdf.

  1. Quality and Feasibility of the Program Idea · 30 points · about 3 pages

    What reviewers look for (notice p. 18):

    The program idea is well developed, with detail about how program activities will be carried out, and includes a reasonable implementation timeline. The proposal adheres to Administration priorities outlined in the National Security Strategy, executive orders, the FY 2026-2030 Department of State Agency Strategic Plan, and country-specific recommendations in the annual Trafficking in Persons Report.

    [[NEEDS: your answer to this criterion, with facts and numbers from your organization]]

  2. Organizational Capacity and Record on Previous Grants · 20 points · about 2 pages

    What reviewers look for (notice p. 18):

    The organization has expertise in its stated field and has the internal controls in place to manage federal funds. This includes a financial management system and a bank account. If sub-awards are proposed, applicant demonstrates experience managing sub-awards.

    [[NEEDS: your answer to this criterion, with facts and numbers from your organization]]

  3. Program Planning/Ability to Achieve Objectives · 15 points · about 1.5 pages

    What reviewers look for (notice p. 19):

    Goals and objectives are clearly stated and program approach is likely to provide maximum impact in achieving the proposed results.

    [[NEEDS: your answer to this criterion, with facts and numbers from your organization]]

  4. Budget · 10 points · about 1 page

    What reviewers look for (notice p. 19):

    The budget justification is detailed. Costs are reasonable in relation to the proposed activities and anticipated results. The budget is realistic, accounting for all necessary expenses to achieve proposed activities.

    [[NEEDS: your answer to this criterion, with facts and numbers from your organization]]

  5. Monitoring and evaluation plan · 15 points · about 1.5 pages

    What reviewers look for (notice p. 19):

    Applicant demonstrates it is able to measure program success against key indicators and provides milestones to indicate progress toward goals outlined in the proposal. The program includes output and outcome indicators and shows how and when those will be measured.

    [[NEEDS: your answer to this criterion, with facts and numbers from your organization]]

  6. Sustainability · 10 points · about 1 page

    What reviewers look for (notice p. 19):

    Program activities will continue to have positive impact after the end of the program.

    [[NEEDS: your answer to this criterion, with facts and numbers from your organization]]

Draft written? Score it against these criteria and check each section's length. Want to see how others did it? Sample proposals agencies have posted.

Built from the official notice's scoring section. Section names, order and page limits come from the notice.