Score your draft
Child Protection Compact Annual Program Statement. Rate your own draft against each scoring criterion in the official notice, the way a reviewer would read it.
A self-check, not a prediction. Reviewers decide the real score. GrantMe doesn't read or rate your writing; you do.
Private by design. Nothing you type or paste on this page is sent to GrantMe or saved anywhere. Reloading or closing the page clears it. Print the page to keep your scores.
Scores listed: 99 points (the notice's total wasn't found; check it). Source: the official notice, FY_2026_CPC_Annual_Program_Statement.pdf. If the notice describes rating levels for its criteria, use its words when you score.
How to use it
- Read what reviewers look for under each criterion.
- Find the part of your draft that answers it. Paste it in the box to check its length.
- Give yourself a score from 0 to the criterion's points. Start with the lowest scores when you revise.
Scoring criteria
-
Country Child Trafficking Situational Assessment · 33 points
What reviewers look for (notice p. 16):
The application clearly describes the child trafficking context of the country and identifies strategies or approaches that could support successful implementation of a CPC. The application does not include any strategies or approaches contrary to any standing Executive Orders or Department policies.
of 33 points
0 words · 0 charactersCounting needs JavaScript. Without it, use your word processor's word count.
-
Organizational Capacity and Record on Previous Grants · 33 points
What reviewers look for (notice p. 16):
The organization demonstrates the experience, capacities, and qualifications that enable it (and sub- applicant(s) if applicable) to implement CPC objectives. The application describes subject matter expertise it could bring to the project. The applicant has internal controls in place to manage federal funds and experience administering projects of similar size and scope in the country, preferably on child trafficking. This includes a financial management system and a bank account. If sub-awards are proposed, applicant demonstrates experience managing subawards.
of 33 points
0 words · 0 charactersCounting needs JavaScript. Without it, use your word processor's word count.
-
Anti-Trafficking Relationships · 33 points
What reviewers look for (notice p. 16):
The organization demonstrates relationships with key anti-trafficking actors and relevant organizations, for example, government entities, private sector actors, local civil society organizations, non-governmental organizations, communities of faith, other donors, international organizations, and academia, that would advance the goal and objectives of the CPC and improve collaboration to effectively address child trafficking in the country.
of 33 points
0 words · 0 charactersCounting needs JavaScript. Without it, use your word processor's word count.
Your total: ______ of 99 points
Length limits in this notice
- Proposal: 5 pages max (notice p. 9) “Proposal (5 pages maximum) Applicants should not propose activities; an intervention plan would be created and validated at a later date if a CPC is pursued with the country.”
Page limits can't be checked from pasted text. Check them in your word processor with the notice's font, spacing and margins. A limit marked “suggested” isn't a rule. Word and character counts can differ between tools (and some forms count spaces), so leave some room.
Count any text
0 words · 0 charactersCounting needs JavaScript. Without it, use your word processor's word count.
See how others wrote it
Sample proposals agencies have posted. Read them for structure; don't copy their words.
Built from the official notice's scoring section. Criteria, points and quotes come from the notice; the three questions under each criterion are GrantMe's, not the funder's.